If you've been paying attention to golf these days, you know that there's
a controversy surrounding the Augusta National and its firm stance on not
allowing women into the club.Does this matter? From many of the sneering commentaries I've been reading
today, "
I suspect that if the players all said what they honestly felt, their
official position would be: Who cares? And also: Can we just play golf,
please?" and
the backlash against Martha Burk, the feminist who continues to
protest the club's exclusion of women, and the silence of many famous golf
players - it would seem it's a silly side issue that no one except those
caught in the middle find important.
But I think it *is* important. That the backlash include pot-shots at
suffragettes is important. That few care if women can enter the ranks of
the wealthy and powerful and move among them as one of them is important.
That a highly respected, highly visible tournament in a major sport is
still an all-boys club is important.
Why?
Well, let me back up for a minute and look at a smaller picture. Have you
have gone looking for women's hiking boots? I have. And I was blown away
by the fact that they were damn hard to find. In this day and age? With
all of my technology sector contemporaries hiking in the parks of
California? before I started looking I just ASSUMED that they be easy to
find. I'd trot on over to any sporting goods store and find rows and rows
of women's hiking boots comparable to the rows and rows of men's hiking
boots....
It's not the case. Do you remember me grousing in my blog about how I
couldn't find a women's size watch with a tachymeter in it like my
sweetie's got? Well, I still haven't found one and any watch maker I ask
gives me that "look". Yeah, you know the one - "Why on god's green earth
would a woman want a SPORTING watch with a TACHYMETER on it in HER size?
Nobody makes that kind of thing. What planet are you from?"
I started noticing other things too. Like the fact that a lot of travel
gear is aimed at guys. Or that steel-toed work boots ONLY come in men's
sizes. (Hey! A pair of those might be nice if we do home improvement.)
I grew up with a dad who was proud of his girl's athletic achievements. My
sister and I played tennis and were extremely active and healthy. We
even won a few tournaments before we headed off to college. But we were
also playing in the post-King post-Evert era where Martina Navratilova
blasted through the sport with power and strength that the Williams
sisters would later take to an artform. Is was OKAY for my sister and I to
hit the ball hard! It was OKAY for us to be POWERFUL in that sport. It was
EXPECTED that we'd play a game with as much drive, guts, power and sport
as the guys were doing.
And it felt *great*. It was empowering, energizing and it kept us healthy
and strong. Yes, STRONG. I used to be able to lift almost two thirds my
own weight and regularly amazed my coworkers by moving desks and huge
computer equipment with no help from the men in the department. I just
*could*. It wasn't a big deal.
(Of course now, years after a computer desk job and no athletic endeavors
I've lost all my muscle tone and find myself in poorer health and at the
mercy of others to help me lift and move things. But that's another
story.)
It's been a joyful, and throughly entertaining, experience to watch women
win and play so well that they draw crowds. Women's soccer, women's
basketball, etc. In watching these highly visible players you'd expect
that women have finally made it everywhere within the arena of sports. At
least I did. I've had a rude awakening of sorts here lately. Just go
shopping with me for hockey equipment sometime.
So now I'm finding that women are still a rarity of sorts in many of
the "outdoorsman" type sports. I should have noticed. Outdoorsman sporting
gear is always located in that sort of "men's only" section of Walmart.
You know how there's the sewing stuff over in one corner and the guns,
knives and fishing equipment in another? Fishing - that's another sport I
grew up with. My dad, my sister and I would fish off the Galveston island
jetties on regular basis. I rediscovered it about a year ago, and I'm
itching to head out to the Gulf with a pole and some shrimp for bait...
But I digress. I'm finding that, as women, we're not marketed to, or we
have to search for specialty sellers for our gear in many outdoor sports.
And we have to slog through the pile of fashion influenced items to find
true gear.
But so what you ask? What does any of this matter when there are women
dying kitchen deaths in India? Trust me, these are the kinds of issues
that are at the top of many fellow feminist's agendas. Their important -
OBVIOUSLY so.
But the sports question is important too, if only for the fact that women
struggling with basic human rights in other areas will eventually have the
"luxury" of struggling with these issues too! And women often struggle to
engage in sports in even the most dire of social circumstances. I still
remember reading about a group of Iranian women who loved to rock climb.
There they were, climbing the face of a cliff - in full on black
abayas while men with rifles took pot shots at them from the ground.
That's dedication. And that's also proof that sports are important to
women, and that it's just one of many important feminist issue.
Which brings me back to the Augusta Nationals. Obviously women haven't
made it everywhere in sports yet. And most people acknowledge lack of
women's participation, or barriers to participation in the actual sport as
a shame and as something that must change. Okay then. But it seems to stop
there. We can become the players, surely. We must educate marketers and
sporting goods manufacturers that we're out there and change a few
male-egos in the process, but there's no one out there saying we
shouldn't.
But there are people saying women shouldn't attempt to enter halls of
power.
Because that's what the Augusta National is all about. It's a club for
rich and powerful men of golf. And it's not for women. Golf - the sport
most closely linked to the powerful businessman. To the deal cemented
over a leisurely game. There's a sense of business class and social power
associated with the sport of golf. And one of the most prestigious of golf
clubs, backing a well known and important golf tournament - the Masters -
won't allow women to join. It's important to note those connections. Sport
and business. Power and influence.
Society will go so far as to allow women to participate in sports. There's
a nod to the idea that it's good for our health and well being and that in
turn is good for society. "Fine. Let women play. I guess it won't hurt
anything," is the attitude. But the moment women want to enter the
hallowed halls of *power* and *money* behind the tournaments, we're
jeered.
And that, right there, is the core issue. Power. Money. Influence.
Prestige and networking. These are things still denied to women, and not
just in golf. Others will argue that the issue here is about a private
club being able to choose it's own members. I think it's more than that. I
think the reactions to the very IDEA that women should be allowed into
this club, the fierce resistance to it without a decent reason why, and
the sadly uninterested reactions by a large majority of feminists points
to that still unchanged social law. Sure, there are women among the rich
and powerful and highly networked. But they are sometimes not seen as
women, and they are still oddities. The accepted rules is still that women
shall not wield power, and they shall not hob-nob AS one of the rich,
powerful and connected unless they got there by their looks, sexuality or
on the arm of a male.