Comparing the Lies
2 July 2003, 7:57 PM
Heard about this
article on a listserv, so I checked it out. One particular paragraph
stood out for me:
But even if WMDs aren't found (or planted), the Inquirer's Dick Polman
assures that "Americans might overlook Bush's claims because the war in
Iraq was brief and had few U.S. casualties." As a matter of course, Polman
also compares George Bush's lies to Bill Clinton's, as if saying "I did
not have sexual relations with that woman" is somehow comparable to
spilling both blood and treasure. Given that thousands of Iraqis and more
than 200 Americans have already lost their lives (even as US soldiers are
ambushed and murdered daily) and that the illegal occupation of Iraq is
expected to last somewhere between 5 and 60 years, weighing the
consequential trauma of Monica's soiled blue dress against the long-term
consequences of Bush Doctrine-related fabrications is like wondering if
Martha Stewart is as criminally diabolical as John Wayne Gacy.
Nicely put.